Accretion Phase of White Dwarf Evolution: Difference between revisions

From PhyWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New page: ==Presenter : TBD == ====Suggested Starting Points==== ===Assigned Reading=== ---- ==Discussion== ----- [[http://wiki.physics.fsu.edu/wiki/index.php/AST4218/5315:_Astrophysical_Seminar_...)
 
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:


----
----
Read both of the following papers, neither are terribly long.  Do not worry about the calculations too much, focus more on the input physics of the models as well as the results.
http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1982ApJ...253..798N
http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998ApJ...496..376C


==Discussion==
==Discussion==
Why are high accretion rates problematic for reaching the Chandrasekhar mass?
Why are low accretion rates problematic for reaching the Chandrasekhar mass?
What difference can one notice in the results of Nomoto Fig 9 and Cassis et al.'s Fig. 10?
What can one conclude from Fig 10 of Cassisi et al.?


-----
-----
[[http://wiki.physics.fsu.edu/wiki/index.php/AST4218/5315:_Astrophysical_Seminar_-_Fall_2009  Back to Astro Seminar]]
[http://wiki.physics.fsu.edu/wiki/index.php/AST4218/5315:_Astrophysical_Seminar_-_Fall_2009  Back to Astro Seminar]

Latest revision as of 10:32, 17 September 2009

Presenter : TBD

Suggested Starting Points

Assigned Reading


Read both of the following papers, neither are terribly long. Do not worry about the calculations too much, focus more on the input physics of the models as well as the results.

http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1982ApJ...253..798N

http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998ApJ...496..376C

Discussion

Why are high accretion rates problematic for reaching the Chandrasekhar mass?

Why are low accretion rates problematic for reaching the Chandrasekhar mass?

What difference can one notice in the results of Nomoto Fig 9 and Cassis et al.'s Fig. 10?

What can one conclude from Fig 10 of Cassisi et al.?


Back to Astro Seminar