Phy5646/Non-degenerate Perturbation Theory - Problem 3: Difference between revisions

From PhyWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 21: Line 21:


(b) The second-order term involves  
(b) The second-order term involves  
a^y \{k\x\n)\2 _q2%2 h \(k\A+A+\n)\2
 
ten hm(n k) fuo 2mio ^n n — k
:<math>
q^{2}\mathcal{E}^{2}=\sum_{k\neq n}\frac{|\langle k|x|n\rangle|^{2}}{\hbar \omega (n-k)}
</math>
 
The only contributions come from k = n — 1 and k = n + 1, so that  
The only contributions come from k = n — 1 and k = n + 1, so that  
\{k\A + A+\n)\2 _ |V^|2 | |V^TI|2 _ i  
\{k\A + A+\n)\2 _ |V^|2 | |V^TI|2 _ i  

Revision as of 07:02, 3 April 2010

(Submitted by Team 1)

This example taken from "Quantum Physics" 3rd ed., Stephen Gasiorowicz, p. 177.

Problem: A charged particle in a simple harmonic oscillator, for which , subject to a constant electric field so that . Calculate the energy shift for the level to first and second order in . (Hint: Use the operators and for the evaluation of the matrix elements).


Solution: (a) To first order we need to calculate . It is easy to show that . One way is to use the relation


and since and we see that .

(b) The second-order term involves

The only contributions come from k = n — 1 and k = n + 1, so that \{k\A + A+\n)\2 _ |V^|2 | |V^TI|2 _ i ten n-k 1 -1 and thus 9¾2 £(2) = 2mu> The result is independent of n. We can check for its correctness by noting that the total potential energy is 1 n co 1 J ? 24% \ I i( <&> Y 92¾2 — rruo x + q%x = ■= m<o\ xr H x I = -z ma>\ x H 2 H 2 \ tm? I 2 V mco2/ 2rm>2 Thus the perturbation shifts the center of the potential by —q%/mco2 and lowers the energy by q2%2l2rmp-, which agrees with our second-order result.