Phy5646/Non-degenerate Perturbation Theory - Problem 3: Difference between revisions

From PhyWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(10 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:


This example taken from "Quantum Physics" 3rd ed., Stephen Gasiorowicz, p. 177.
This example taken from "Quantum Physics" 3rd ed., Stephen Gasiorowicz, p. 177.
-----


'''Problem:'''
'''Problem:'''
A charged particle in a simple harmonic oscillator, for which <math>{H}_0 = \frac{p^{2}}{2m} + \frac{mw^{2}}{2}</math>,  
A charged particle in a simple harmonic oscillator, for which <math>{H}_0 = \frac{p^{2}}{2m} + \frac{mw^{2}}{2}</math>,  
subject to a constant electric field so that <math>{H}^' = q\mathcal{E} x</math>. Calculate the energy shift  
subject to a constant electric field so that <math>{H}^' = q\mathcal{E} x</math>. Calculate the energy shift  
for the <math>n^{th}</math> level to first and second order in <math>(q\mathcal{E})</math>.  
for the <math>n^{th}\!</math> level to first and second order in <math>(q\mathcal{E})</math>.  
(Hint: Use the operators <math>a</math> and <math>a^{\dagger}</math> for the evaluation of the matrix elements).
(Hint: Use the operators <math>a</math> and <math>a^{\dagger}</math> for the evaluation of the matrix elements).


-----


'''Solution:'''
'''Solution:'''
(a) To first order we need to calculate <math>{H}^' = q\mathcal{E}\langle n|x|n\rangle</math>. It is easy to show that <math>\langle n|x|n\rangle = 0</math>. One way is to use the relation  
(a) To first order we need to calculate <math>{H}^' = q\mathcal{E}\langle n|x|n\rangle</math>. It is easy to show that <math>\langle n|x|n\rangle = 0</math>. One way is to use the relation  


:<math>
:<math>
x=\sqrt{\frac{\hbar}{2m\omega}}(a+a^{\dagger})
x=\sqrt{\frac{\hbar}{2m\omega}}\left(a+a^{\dagger}\right)
</math>
</math>


and since <math>A|n\rangle = \sqrt{n}|n-1\rangle</math> and <math>A^{\dagger}|n\rangle = \sqrt{n+1}|n+1\rangle</math> we see that <math>\langle n|x|n\rangle = 0</math>.
and since <math>A|n\rangle = \sqrt{n}|n-1\rangle</math> and <math>A^{\dagger}|n\rangle = \sqrt{n+1}|n+1\rangle</math> we see that <math>\langle n|x|n\rangle = 0</math>.


(b) The second-order term involves  
(b) The second-order term involves  
a^y \{k\x\n)\2 _q2%2 h \(k\A+A+\n)\2  
 
ten hm(n — k) fuo 2mio ^n n — k  
:<math>
The only contributions come from k = n 1 and k = n + 1, so that  
q^{2}\mathcal{E}^{2}\sum_{k\neq n}\frac{|\langle k|x|n\rangle|^{2}}{\hbar \omega (n-k)}= \frac{q^{2}\mathcal{E}^{2}}{\hbar\omega}\frac{\hbar}{2m\omega}\sum_{k\neq n} \frac{\left|\left\langle k\left|a+a^{\dagger}\right|n\right\rangle\right|^{2}}{n-k}
\{k\A + A+\n)\2 _ |V^|2 | |V^TI|2 _ i
</math>
ten n-k 1 -1  
 
The only contributions come from <math>k=n-1 \!</math> and <math>k=n+1 \!</math>, so that  
 
:<math>
\sum_{k\neq n} \frac{\left|\left\langle k\left|a+a^{\dagger}\right|n\right\rangle\right|^{2}}{n-k}=\left|\sqrt{n}\right|^{2}-\left|\sqrt{n+1}\right|^{2}=-1
</math>
 
and thus  
and thus  
9¾2
 
£(2) =  
:<math>
2mu>  
E_{n}^{(2)}=-\frac{q^{2}\mathcal{E}^{2}}{2m\omega}
The result is independent of n. We can check for its correctness by noting that the total potential   
</math>
 
The result is independent of <math>n\!</math>. We can check for its correctness by noting that the total potential   
energy is  
energy is  
1 n co 1 J ? 24% \ I i( <&> Y 92¾2
 
— rruo x + q%x = = m<o\ xr H x I = -z ma>\ x H
:<math>
2 H 2 \ tm? I 2 V mco2/ 2rm>2
\frac{1}{2}m\omega^{2}x^{2}+q\mathcal{E}x=\frac{1}{2}m\omega^{2}\left(x^{2}+\frac{2q\mathcal{E}}{m\omega^{2}}x\right)=\frac{1}{2}m\omega^{2}\left(x+\frac{q\mathcal{E}}{m\omega^{2}}\right)^{2}-\frac{q^{2}\mathcal{E}^{2}}{2m\omega^{2}}
Thus the perturbation shifts the center of the potential by —q%/mco2 and lowers the energy by  
</math>
q2%2l2rmp-, which agrees with our second-order result.
 
Thus the perturbation shifts the center of the potential by <math> -\frac{q\mathcal{E}}{m\omega^{2}}</math> and lowers the energy by  
<math>\frac{q^{2}\mathcal{E}^{2}}{2m\omega^{2}}</math>, which agrees with our second-order result.

Latest revision as of 22:13, 24 April 2010

(Submitted by Team 1)

This example taken from "Quantum Physics" 3rd ed., Stephen Gasiorowicz, p. 177.


Problem:

A charged particle in a simple harmonic oscillator, for which , subject to a constant electric field so that . Calculate the energy shift for the level to first and second order in . (Hint: Use the operators and for the evaluation of the matrix elements).


Solution:

(a) To first order we need to calculate . It is easy to show that . One way is to use the relation

and since and we see that .

(b) The second-order term involves

The only contributions come from and , so that

and thus

The result is independent of . We can check for its correctness by noting that the total potential energy is

Thus the perturbation shifts the center of the potential by and lowers the energy by , which agrees with our second-order result.