Phy5646/soham1: Difference between revisions

From PhyWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
(Introduction to Qusntum Mechanics, Griffiths, 2e)Problem 7.14
(Introduction to Quantum Mechanics, Griffiths, 2e)Problem 7.14


If the photon has a nonzero mass <math>(m_{\gamma} \neq 0)</math>, the Coulomb potential would be rep[laced by the Yukawa potential,
If the photon has a nonzero mass <math>(m_{\gamma} \neq 0)</math>, the Coulomb potential would be rep[laced by the Yukawa potential,
Line 10: Line 10:
The hydrogen atom Hamiltonian is  <math>\mathcal H = \frac{-\hbar^{2}}{2m} - \frac{e^{2}}{4\pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{1}{r} = T+V</math>
The hydrogen atom Hamiltonian is  <math>\mathcal H = \frac{-\hbar^{2}}{2m} - \frac{e^{2}}{4\pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{1}{r} = T+V</math>


For hydrogen atom with standard Coulomb potential (massless photons), we have <math>\langle T\rangle = \langle V\rangle,</math> with <math>\langle T\rangle = \frac{\hbar^{2}}{2ma^2}</math>
For hydrogen atom with standard Coulomb potential (massless photons), we have <math>\langle T\rangle = \langle V\rangle,</math> with <math>\langle T\rangle = -E_{1}\frac{\hbar^{2}}{2ma^2}</math>


For the Yukawa potential, <math>\langle T\rangle =\frac{\hbar^{2}}{2mb^2} </math> and  
For the Yukawa potential, <math>\langle T\rangle =\frac{\hbar^{2}}{2mb^2} </math> and  
Line 19: Line 19:


<math>\frac{\partial \mathcal H}{\partial b} = 0 = \frac{\hbar^{2}}{mb^{3}} + \frac{-e^2}{4\pi \epsilon_{0}}\left [\frac{1}{b(1 + \mu b/2)^{2}} + \frac{\mu}{b(1+\mu b/2)^{3}} \right ] = frac{\hbar^{2}}{mb^{3}} + \frac{-e^2}{4\pi \epsilon_{0}b^{2}}\left [\frac{1 + 3\mu b/2)}{(1 + \mu b/2)^3} \right ]</math>
<math>\frac{\partial \mathcal H}{\partial b} = 0 = \frac{\hbar^{2}}{mb^{3}} + \frac{-e^2}{4\pi \epsilon_{0}}\left [\frac{1}{b(1 + \mu b/2)^{2}} + \frac{\mu}{b(1+\mu b/2)^{3}} \right ] = frac{\hbar^{2}}{mb^{3}} + \frac{-e^2}{4\pi \epsilon_{0}b^{2}}\left [\frac{1 + 3\mu b/2)}{(1 + \mu b/2)^3} \right ]</math>
Or, <math>frac{4\pi\epsilon_{0}\hbar^{2}}{me_{2}} = b\frac{1 + 3\mu b/2)}{(1 + \mu b/2)^3}</math>
Or, <math>b\frac{1 + 3\mu b/2)}{(1 + \mu b/2)^3} = a</math>
Now since <math>\mu a \ll  1, <math>\mu b \ll  1</math></math>. So
<math>b(1 + 3\mu b/2)\left [1 - \frac{3\mu b}{2} + 6 \frac{\mu^{2} b^{2}}{4} \right ] \approx a</math>
Or, <math>a \approx = b\left [ 1-3(\mu b)^{2}/4  \right ]</math>
In the second order term, we can replace <math>b</math> by <math>a</math> So
<math>b \approx a\left [1+3(\mu a)^{2}/4  \right ]</math>
With this optimized value of <math>b</math>, we can find out <math>\langle \mathcal H\rangle</math>
<math>\langle \mathcal H\rangle = \frac{\hbar^{2}}{2ma^{2}\left [1+3(\mu a)^{2}/4  \right ]} - \frac{e^2}{4\pi \epsilon_{0}}\frac{1}{a\left [1+3(\mu a)^{2}/4  \right ]\left [1+\mu a/2  \right ]^2}</math> where we have approximated <math>b</math> by <math>a</math> in the last bracketed term in the denominator.
Or,<math>\langle \mathcal H\rangle = \frac{\hbar^{2}}{2ma^2} \left [1-6(\mu a)^{2}/4  \right ] - \frac{-e^2}{4\pi \epsilon_{0}a}\left [1-3(\mu a)^{2}/4  \right ]\left [1-2(\mu a)/2 +3(\mu a/2)^{2} \right ]
= -E_{1}\left [1-3(\mu a)^{2}/2  \right ] +2E_{1}\left [1 -\mu a - \frac{3}{4}(\mu a)^2 + \frac{3}{4}(\mu a)^2 \right ]</math>
Or, <math>\langle \mathcal H\rangle = E_{1}\left [1-2\mu a +\frac{3}{2}(\mu a)^{2}  \right ]</math>

Latest revision as of 22:14, 30 April 2010

(Introduction to Quantum Mechanics, Griffiths, 2e)Problem 7.14

If the photon has a nonzero mass , the Coulomb potential would be rep[laced by the Yukawa potential, where . With a trial wave function of your own devising, estimate the binding energy of a "hydrogen" atom with this potential. Assume , where , and give your answer correct to order

Solution:

The simplest trial function looks exactly like the hydrogen atom ground wavefunction, but with changed to . . acts as a variational parameter. The hydrogen atom Hamiltonian is

For hydrogen atom with standard Coulomb potential (massless photons), we have with

For the Yukawa potential, and

Or,

Or, Or, Now since </math>. So

Or,

In the second order term, we can replace by So

With this optimized value of , we can find out

where we have approximated by in the last bracketed term in the denominator.

Or, Or,