Solution to Set 3: Difference between revisions

From PhyWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Changed the formatting)
(Given Information)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Ising antiferromagnet on a ”bipartite” lattice'''
This assignment corresponds to Section 8.3 and 8.4 in the Solid State Physics book. It deals with the topics of Magnetic Order.
==Given Informatin==
* Hamiltonian <math> H = \frac{J}{2} \sum_{<ij>} S_i S_j  -− h\sum_i S_i </math>,
* Bipartite lattice:  a lattice with 2 sublattices, so that each spin on sublattice A interacts only with some spin on the other sublattice B. In an antiferromagnetic state, each sublattice assumes a uniform magnetization.
* Magnetization for Lattice A: <math> m_A = < S^{(A)} > </math> 
* Magnetization for Lattice B: <math> m_B = < S^{(B)} > </math>
* Average magnetization: <math>m = \frac{1}{2} (m_A + m_B ),</math>
* "Staggered” magnetization: <math>m^{\dagger} = \frac{1}{2} (m_A - m_B ),</math> (''Note: It's the difference between the two sublattices'')
* <math>m = 1\;</math> for perfect ferromagnetic order
* <math>m^{\dagger} = 1</math> for perfect antiferromagnetic order
==Part 1==
==Part 1==
'''(1) Use Weiss mean-field decoupling to replace one of the spins in the Hamiltonian by its thermal average. The Weiss field experienced by a given spin is then proportional to the sublattice magnetization on the other sublattice. Write down self-consistent equations for m_A\; and m_B\;, and express them through the order parameters m\; and m^{\dagger}.'''
'''(1) Use Weiss mean-field decoupling to replace one of the spins in the Hamiltonian by its thermal average. The Weiss field experienced by a given spin is then proportional to the sublattice magnetization on the other sublattice. Write down self-consistent equations for <math>m_A\;</math> and <math>m_B\;</math>, and express them through the
order parameters <math>m\;</math> and <math>m^{\dagger}</math>.'''
 
First, Weiss mean field decoupling


==Part 2==
==Part 2==
'''(2) Assume that h = 0\;, so that m = 0\;, and solve the mean-field equations by expanding in m^{\dagger}. Determine the Neel (ordering) temperature, and calculate the order-parameter exponent.'''
'''(2) Assume that <math>h = 0\;</math>, so that <math>m = 0\;</math>, and solve the mean-field equations by expanding in <math>m^{\dagger}</math>. Determine the Neel (ordering) temperature, and calculate the order-parameter exponent.
 
'''
 
==Part 3==
==Part 3==
'''(3) Now consider a small external field h > 0\;, so that both order parameters can assume a nonzero value (Note: m\; will be small). By keeping only the leading terms in h\; and m\;, calculate the uniform spin susceptibility \chi = \partial m/ \partial h, as a function of temperature. Plot \chi\; as a function of temperature, and show that it has a cusp around T_N\;.'''
'''(3) Now consider a small external field <math>h > 0\;</math>, so that both order parameters can assume a nonzero value (Note: <math>m\;</math> will be small). By keeping only the leading terms in <math>h\;</math> and <math>m\;</math>, calculate the uniform spin susceptibility <math>\chi = \partial m/ \partial h</math>, as a function of temperature. Plot <math>\chi\;</math> as a function of temperature, and show that it has a cusp around <math>T_N\;</math>.'''


==Part 4==
==Part 4==
'''(4) Imagine adding a ”staggered” external field h^{\dagger}, which would be positive on sublattice A, but would be negative on sublattice B. Concentrate on the system with no uniform field (h = 0)\;, and determine the behavior of the staggered susceptibility \chi^{\dagger}= \partial m^{\dagger} / \partial h^{\dagger} . Show that \chi^{\dagger} blows up at the Neel temperature.'''
'''(4) Imagine adding a ”staggered” external field <math>h^{\dagger}</math>, which would be positive on sublattice A, but would be negative on sublattice B. Concentrate on the system with no uniform field <math>(h = 0)\;</math>, and determine the behavior of the staggered susceptibility <math>\chi^{\dagger}= \partial m^{\dagger} / \partial h^{\dagger} </math>. Show that <math>\chi^{\dagger}</math> blows up at the Neel temperature.'''

Revision as of 18:42, 3 February 2009

Ising antiferromagnet on a ”bipartite” lattice

This assignment corresponds to Section 8.3 and 8.4 in the Solid State Physics book. It deals with the topics of Magnetic Order.

Given Informatin

  • Hamiltonian Failed to parse (syntax error): {\displaystyle H = \frac{J}{2} \sum_{<ij>} S_i S_j -− h\sum_i S_i } ,
  • Bipartite lattice: a lattice with 2 sublattices, so that each spin on sublattice A interacts only with some spin on the other sublattice B. In an antiferromagnetic state, each sublattice assumes a uniform magnetization.
  • Magnetization for Lattice A:
  • Magnetization for Lattice B:
  • Average magnetization:
  • "Staggered” magnetization: (Note: It's the difference between the two sublattices)
  • for perfect ferromagnetic order
  • for perfect antiferromagnetic order

Part 1

(1) Use Weiss mean-field decoupling to replace one of the spins in the Hamiltonian by its thermal average. The Weiss field experienced by a given spin is then proportional to the sublattice magnetization on the other sublattice. Write down self-consistent equations for and , and express them through the order parameters and .

First, Weiss mean field decoupling

Part 2

(2) Assume that , so that , and solve the mean-field equations by expanding in . Determine the Neel (ordering) temperature, and calculate the order-parameter exponent.

Part 3

(3) Now consider a small external field , so that both order parameters can assume a nonzero value (Note: will be small). By keeping only the leading terms in and , calculate the uniform spin susceptibility , as a function of temperature. Plot as a function of temperature, and show that it has a cusp around .

Part 4

(4) Imagine adding a ”staggered” external field , which would be positive on sublattice A, but would be negative on sublattice B. Concentrate on the system with no uniform field , and determine the behavior of the staggered susceptibility . Show that blows up at the Neel temperature.