Solution to Set 3: Difference between revisions
(Given Information) |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This assignment corresponds to Section 8.3 and 8.4 in the Solid State Physics book. It deals with the topics of Magnetic Order. | This assignment corresponds to Section 8.3 and 8.4 in the Solid State Physics book. It deals with the topics of Magnetic Order. | ||
==Given Informatin== | ==Given Informatin== | ||
* Hamiltonian <math> H = \frac{J}{2} \sum_{<ij>} S_i S_j -− h\sum_i S_i </math>, | * '''Classical Ising antiferromagnet on a ”bipartite” lattice''' given by Hamiltonian <math> H = \frac{J}{2} \sum_{<ij>} S_i S_j -− h\sum_i S_i </math>, | ||
* Bipartite lattice: a lattice with 2 sublattices, so that each spin on sublattice A interacts only with some spin on the other sublattice B. In an antiferromagnetic state, each sublattice assumes a uniform magnetization. | * Bipartite lattice: a lattice with 2 sublattices, so that each spin on sublattice A interacts only with some spin on the other sublattice B. In an antiferromagnetic state, each sublattice assumes a uniform magnetization. | ||
* Magnetization for Lattice A: <math> m_A = < S^{(A)} > </math> | * Magnetization for Lattice A: <math> m_A = < S^{(A)} > </math> |
Revision as of 20:05, 3 February 2009
This assignment corresponds to Section 8.3 and 8.4 in the Solid State Physics book. It deals with the topics of Magnetic Order.
Given Informatin
- Classical Ising antiferromagnet on a ”bipartite” lattice given by Hamiltonian Failed to parse (syntax error): {\displaystyle H = \frac{J}{2} \sum_{<ij>} S_i S_j -− h\sum_i S_i } ,
- Bipartite lattice: a lattice with 2 sublattices, so that each spin on sublattice A interacts only with some spin on the other sublattice B. In an antiferromagnetic state, each sublattice assumes a uniform magnetization.
- Magnetization for Lattice A:
- Magnetization for Lattice B:
- Average magnetization:
- "Staggered” magnetization: (Note: It's the difference between the two sublattices)
- for perfect ferromagnetic order
- for perfect antiferromagnetic order
Part 1
(1) Use Weiss mean-field decoupling to replace one of the spins in the Hamiltonian by its thermal average. The Weiss field experienced by a given spin is then proportional to the sublattice magnetization on the other sublattice. Write down self-consistent equations for and , and express them through the order parameters and .
First, Weiss mean field decoupling
Part 2
(2) Assume that , so that , and solve the mean-field equations by expanding in . Determine the Neel (ordering) temperature, and calculate the order-parameter exponent.
Part 3
(3) Now consider a small external field , so that both order parameters can assume a nonzero value (Note: will be small). By keeping only the leading terms in and , calculate the uniform spin susceptibility , as a function of temperature. Plot as a function of temperature, and show that it has a cusp around .
Part 4
(4) Imagine adding a ”staggered” external field , which would be positive on sublattice A, but would be negative on sublattice B. Concentrate on the system with no uniform field , and determine the behavior of the staggered susceptibility . Show that blows up at the Neel temperature.