Solution to Set 3: Difference between revisions

From PhyWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Given Information)
mNo edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Ising antiferromagnet on a ”bipartite” lattice'''
This assignment corresponds to Section 8.3 and 8.4 in the Solid State Physics book. It deals with the topics of Magnetic Order.
This assignment corresponds to Section 8.3 and 8.4 in the Solid State Physics book. It deals with the topics of Magnetic Order.


==Given Informatin==
==Given Informatin==


* Hamiltonian <math> H = \frac{J}{2} \sum_{<ij>} S_i S_j  -− h\sum_i S_i </math>,
* '''Classical Ising antiferromagnet on a ”bipartite” lattice''' given by Hamiltonian <math> H = \frac{J}{2} \sum_{<ij>} S_i S_j  -− h\sum_i S_i </math>,
* Bipartite lattice:  a lattice with 2 sublattices, so that each spin on sublattice A interacts only with some spin on the other sublattice B. In an antiferromagnetic state, each sublattice assumes a uniform magnetization.  
* Bipartite lattice:  a lattice with 2 sublattices, so that each spin on sublattice A interacts only with some spin on the other sublattice B. In an antiferromagnetic state, each sublattice assumes a uniform magnetization.  
* Magnetization for Lattice A: <math> m_A = < S^{(A)} > </math>   
* Magnetization for Lattice A: <math> m_A = < S^{(A)} > </math>   

Revision as of 20:05, 3 February 2009

This assignment corresponds to Section 8.3 and 8.4 in the Solid State Physics book. It deals with the topics of Magnetic Order.

Given Informatin

  • Classical Ising antiferromagnet on a ”bipartite” lattice given by Hamiltonian Failed to parse (syntax error): {\displaystyle H = \frac{J}{2} \sum_{<ij>} S_i S_j -− h\sum_i S_i } ,
  • Bipartite lattice: a lattice with 2 sublattices, so that each spin on sublattice A interacts only with some spin on the other sublattice B. In an antiferromagnetic state, each sublattice assumes a uniform magnetization.
  • Magnetization for Lattice A:
  • Magnetization for Lattice B:
  • Average magnetization:
  • "Staggered” magnetization: (Note: It's the difference between the two sublattices)
  • for perfect ferromagnetic order
  • for perfect antiferromagnetic order

Part 1

(1) Use Weiss mean-field decoupling to replace one of the spins in the Hamiltonian by its thermal average. The Weiss field experienced by a given spin is then proportional to the sublattice magnetization on the other sublattice. Write down self-consistent equations for and , and express them through the order parameters and .

First, Weiss mean field decoupling

Part 2

(2) Assume that , so that , and solve the mean-field equations by expanding in . Determine the Neel (ordering) temperature, and calculate the order-parameter exponent.

Part 3

(3) Now consider a small external field , so that both order parameters can assume a nonzero value (Note: will be small). By keeping only the leading terms in and , calculate the uniform spin susceptibility , as a function of temperature. Plot as a function of temperature, and show that it has a cusp around .

Part 4

(4) Imagine adding a ”staggered” external field , which would be positive on sublattice A, but would be negative on sublattice B. Concentrate on the system with no uniform field , and determine the behavior of the staggered susceptibility . Show that blows up at the Neel temperature.