Question: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Can you tell me if this is right? Ive spent some time now working on parts 2,3, and 4 and I am worried that I made an error in part 1 that is propagating to the later parts. | Can you tell me if this is right? Ive spent some time now working on parts 2,3, and 4 and I am worried that I made an error in part 1 that is propagating to the later parts. | ||
<font color=red>'''Vlad: I think you have some sign errors I corrected below'''</font> | <font color=red>'''Vlad: I think you have some sign errors I corrected below. Note that in the case of antiferromagnetism, the interaction J has the opposite sign.'''</font> | ||
I found the two self-consistent equations for <math>m_A</math> and <math>m_B</math> to be: | I found the two self-consistent equations for <math>m_A</math> and <math>m_B</math> to be: | ||
<math>m_A = tanh( | <math>m_A = tanh (+\beta(h-\frac{1}{2}Jzm_B))</math> | ||
<math>m_B = tanh( | <math>m_B = tanh (+\beta(h-\frac{1}{2}Jzm_A))</math> | ||
Then I solved the relations for <math>m</math> and <math>m^\dagger</math> and found that: | Then I solved the relations for <math>m</math> and <math>m^\dagger</math> and found that: |
Revision as of 15:03, 5 February 2009
Can you tell me if this is right? Ive spent some time now working on parts 2,3, and 4 and I am worried that I made an error in part 1 that is propagating to the later parts.
Vlad: I think you have some sign errors I corrected below. Note that in the case of antiferromagnetism, the interaction J has the opposite sign.
I found the two self-consistent equations for and to be:
Then I solved the relations for and and found that:
Then substituting this into the previous equations I get: