Logarithmic Potential in WKB: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: '''For spherically symmetrical potentials, we can apply the WKB approximation to the radial equation. In the case l=0, it is reasonable to use the following equation:''' <math>\int_{0}^{r...) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
<math> E_{n+1}-E_{n}=V_{0}ln(n+\frac{3}{4})-V_{0}ln(n-\frac{1}{4})=V_{0}ln(\frac{n+3/4}{n-1/4}) </math> ''',which is indeed independent of m (and a).''' | <math> E_{n+1}-E_{n}=V_{0}ln(n+\frac{3}{4})-V_{0}ln(n-\frac{1}{4})=V_{0}ln(\frac{n+3/4}{n-1/4}) </math> ''',which is indeed independent of m (and a).''' | ||
Back to [[WKB in Spherical Coordinates]] |
Revision as of 02:22, 13 January 2014
For spherically symmetrical potentials, we can apply the WKB approximation to the radial equation. In the case l=0, it is reasonable to use the following equation:
where r_{0} is the turning point (in effect, we treat r = 0 as an infinite wall). Apply this formula to estimate the alowed energies of a particle in the logarithmic potential.
(for constants and a).
Treat only the case l = 0. Show the spacing between the levels is independent of mass.
Answer:
=
Let
so or . Limits :
,which is indeed independent of m (and a).
Back to WKB in Spherical Coordinates