Phy5646 PerturbationExample1: Difference between revisions

From PhyWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New page: Posted by student team #5 (Chelsey Morien, Anthony Kuchera, Jeff Klatsky) Adapted from Zettili Quantum Mechanics - Concepts and Application; Solved Problem 9.6 Consider a system whose Ha...)
 
No edit summary
Line 76: Line 76:


<math>
<math>
\begin{pmatrix}
det\begin{pmatrix}
  (1 + \lambda)E_0 - E & 0 & 0 & 0 \\
  (1 + \lambda)E_0 - E & 0 & 0 & 0 \\
  0 & 8E_0 - E & 0 & 0 \\
  0 & 8E_0 - E & 0 & 0 \\
  0 & 0 & 3E_0 - E & -2\lambda E_0 \\
  0 & 0 & 3E_0 - E & -2\lambda E_0 \\
  0 & 0 & -2E_0\lambda & 7E_0 - E  
  0 & 0 & -2E_0\lambda & 7E_0 - E  
\end{pmatrix}
\end{pmatrix} = 0
</math>
</math>
which is equivalent to:
<math> (E_0 + \lambda E_0 - E)(8E_0 - E)\left[(3E_0 - E)(7E_0 - E) - 4\lambda^2E_0^2 \right] = 0 </math>
Solving the above equation for E yields the following '''''exact''''' eigenenergies:
<math>E_1^{ } =(1+\lambda)E_{0} </math>
<math>E_2^{ } = 8E_{0}</math>
<math>E_3 = (5 - 2\sqrt{1+\lambda^2})E_0</math>
<math>E_4 = (5 - 2\sqrt{1+\lambda^2})E_0</math>
Since we have defined <math>\lambda << 1 </math>, we can expand <math>\sqrt{1+\lambda^2}</math>, keeping only terms up to second order in <math> \lambda_{ }^{ } </math>:
<math>\sqrt{1+\lambda^2} \simeq 1 + \frac{\lambda^2}{2}</math>, which leads to:
<math>E_3 \simeq (3 - \lambda^2)E_0</math>
<math>E_4 \simeq (7 + \lambda^2)E_0</math>
(c)

Revision as of 16:56, 5 February 2010

Posted by student team #5 (Chelsey Morien, Anthony Kuchera, Jeff Klatsky)

Adapted from Zettili Quantum Mechanics - Concepts and Application; Solved Problem 9.6

Consider a system whose Hamiltonian is given by where

(a) By decomposing the Hamiltonian into , find the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of the unperturbed Hamiltonian.

(b) Diagonalize to find the exact eigenvalues of ; expand each eigenvalue to the second power of

(c) Using first and second-order non-degenerate perturbation theory, find the approximate eigenenergies of and the eigenstates to the first order. Compare these with the exact values obtained in (b).

Solution:

(a) The matrix of can be separated:

is already diagonalized, so reading off its eigenvalues and eigenstates are trivial:

(b) The diagonalization of leads to the following equation:

which is equivalent to:

Solving the above equation for E yields the following exact eigenenergies:

Since we have defined , we can expand , keeping only terms up to second order in :

, which leads to:

(c)