Phy5646 PerturbationExample1: Difference between revisions
(New page: Posted by student team #5 (Chelsey Morien, Anthony Kuchera, Jeff Klatsky) Adapted from Zettili Quantum Mechanics - Concepts and Application; Solved Problem 9.6 Consider a system whose Ha...) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 76: | Line 76: | ||
<math> | <math> | ||
\begin{pmatrix} | det\begin{pmatrix} | ||
(1 + \lambda)E_0 - E & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ | (1 + \lambda)E_0 - E & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ | ||
0 & 8E_0 - E & 0 & 0 \\ | 0 & 8E_0 - E & 0 & 0 \\ | ||
0 & 0 & 3E_0 - E & -2\lambda E_0 \\ | 0 & 0 & 3E_0 - E & -2\lambda E_0 \\ | ||
0 & 0 & -2E_0\lambda & 7E_0 - E | 0 & 0 & -2E_0\lambda & 7E_0 - E | ||
\end{pmatrix} | \end{pmatrix} = 0 | ||
</math> | </math> | ||
which is equivalent to: | |||
<math> (E_0 + \lambda E_0 - E)(8E_0 - E)\left[(3E_0 - E)(7E_0 - E) - 4\lambda^2E_0^2 \right] = 0 </math> | |||
Solving the above equation for E yields the following '''''exact''''' eigenenergies: | |||
<math>E_1^{ } =(1+\lambda)E_{0} </math> | |||
<math>E_2^{ } = 8E_{0}</math> | |||
<math>E_3 = (5 - 2\sqrt{1+\lambda^2})E_0</math> | |||
<math>E_4 = (5 - 2\sqrt{1+\lambda^2})E_0</math> | |||
Since we have defined <math>\lambda << 1 </math>, we can expand <math>\sqrt{1+\lambda^2}</math>, keeping only terms up to second order in <math> \lambda_{ }^{ } </math>: | |||
<math>\sqrt{1+\lambda^2} \simeq 1 + \frac{\lambda^2}{2}</math>, which leads to: | |||
<math>E_3 \simeq (3 - \lambda^2)E_0</math> | |||
<math>E_4 \simeq (7 + \lambda^2)E_0</math> | |||
(c) |
Revision as of 16:56, 5 February 2010
Posted by student team #5 (Chelsey Morien, Anthony Kuchera, Jeff Klatsky)
Adapted from Zettili Quantum Mechanics - Concepts and Application; Solved Problem 9.6
Consider a system whose Hamiltonian is given by where
(a) By decomposing the Hamiltonian into , find the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of the unperturbed Hamiltonian.
(b) Diagonalize to find the exact eigenvalues of ; expand each eigenvalue to the second power of
(c) Using first and second-order non-degenerate perturbation theory, find the approximate eigenenergies of and the eigenstates to the first order. Compare these with the exact values obtained in (b).
Solution:
(a) The matrix of can be separated:
is already diagonalized, so reading off its eigenvalues and eigenstates are trivial:
(b) The diagonalization of leads to the following equation:
which is equivalent to:
Solving the above equation for E yields the following exact eigenenergies:
Since we have defined , we can expand , keeping only terms up to second order in :
, which leads to:
(c)