Phy5645/Double pinhole experiment: Difference between revisions

From PhyWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 10: Line 10:
[[Image:Double_pinhole_1.JPG]]
[[Image:Double_pinhole_1.JPG]]


Suppose you send in an electron along the z axis on a screen at <math>z = 0\!</math> with two pinholes at <math>x = 0, y = \pm d/2\!</math>. On a point <math>(x,y)\!</math> on another screen at <math>z = L>>d, \lambda\!</math>, the distance from each pinhole is given by <math> r_{\pm}=\sqrt{x^{2}+(y\mp d/2)^{2}+L^{2}}\!</math>. The spherical wave from each pinhole is added on the screen and hence the wave function is
Suppose that a beam of electrons, traveling along the <math>z</math> axis, hits a screen at <math>z = 0\!</math> with two pinholes at <math>x = 0, y = \pm d/2\!</math>. For a point <math>(x,y)\!</math> on a second screen at <math>z = L>>d, \lambda\!</math>, the distance from each pinhole is given by <math> r_{\pm}=\sqrt{x^{2}+(y\mp d/2)^{2}+L^{2}}\!</math>. A spherical wave is emitted from each pinhole, and the waves from each add, and hence the wave function at a given point on the second screen is


:<math>\psi(x,y)=\frac{e^{ikr_{+}}}{r_{+}}+\frac{e^{ikr_{-}}}{r_{-}}</math>,
:<math>\psi(x,y)=\frac{e^{ikr_{+}}}{r_{+}}+\frac{e^{ikr_{-}}}{r_{-}}</math>,

Revision as of 16:28, 20 March 2013

Submitted by team 1


Question: Double Pinhole Experiment

Besides the Stern-Gerlach experiment, the double slit experiment also demonstrates the difference between quantum mechanics and classical mechanics. Here, we will discuss a double pinhole experiment rather than a double slit experiment because the former is mathematically simpler and still embodies the basic physics that we wish to demonstrate.


Double pinhole 1.JPG

Suppose that a beam of electrons, traveling along the axis, hits a screen at with two pinholes at . For a point on a second screen at , the distance from each pinhole is given by . A spherical wave is emitted from each pinhole, and the waves from each add, and hence the wave function at a given point on the second screen is

,

where . Answer the following questions.

(a) Considering just the exponential factors, show that the constructive interference appears approximately at

where .

(b) Make a plot of the intensity as a function of , by choosing , and . The intensity is interpreted as the probability distribution for the electron to be detected on the screen, after repeating the same experiment many many times.

(c) Make a contour plot of the intensity as afunction of x and y, for the same parameters.

(d) If you place a counter at both pinholes to see if the electron has passed one of them, all of a sudden the wave function "collapses". If the electron is observed to pass through the pinhole at , the wave function becomes

.

If it is observed to pass through that at , the wave function becomes

.

After repeating this experiment many times with 50:50 probability for each the pinholes, the probability on the screen will be given by



instead. Plot this function on y-axis, and also show the contour plot, to compare its pattern to the case when you do not place a counter. What is the difference from the case without the counter?




Answer:

(a) As directed, we assume that the denominators are approximately the same between two waves. This is justified because the corrections are only of the order of , and we are interested in the case where . We require that the numerators have the same phase, namely . We expand the LHS with respect to ,

Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \begin{align} k(r_{+}-r_{-})&\approx k\left\{\left(\sqrt{L^{2}+x^{2}+y^{2}}+\frac{yd}{2\sqrt{L^{2}+x^{2}+y^{2}}}\right) \right. \\ &-\left.\left(\sqrt{L^{2}+x^{2}+y^{2}}-\frac{yd}{2\sqrt{L^{2}+x^{2}+y^{2}}}\right)\right\}\\ &=k\frac{dy}{\sqrt{L^{2}+x^{2}+y^{2}}} \end{align} }

Therefore,

and hence


(b) Let us choose the unit where k = 1. Then we pick d = 20, L = 1000. Here is the interference pattern. First along the y-axis (x = 0):


Double pinhole plot 1.JPG


(c) Now on the plane:

Double pinhole plot 2.JPG


(d) For the same parameter as in (b), First along the y-axis (x = 0):


Double pinhole plot 3.JPG


Now on the plane:


Double pinhole plot 4.JPG


The main difference is the absence of the interference pattern.