Question: Difference between revisions
MatthewHoza (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
MatthewHoza (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
or are we supposed to substitute one of them into the initial equation of the Ising Model? | or are we supposed to substitute one of them into the initial equation of the Ising Model? | ||
'''Vlad: you see, here the same IDEA applies. However, the magnetization on sublattice A is expressed in | '''Vlad: you see, here the same IDEA applies. However, the magnetization on sublattice A is expressed in terms of the magnetization on sublattice B. Thus we get a similar self-consistency conditions:''' | ||
'''<math>m_A = tanh(\beta(\frac{1}{2}Jzm_B +h))</math>''' | '''<math>m_A = tanh(\beta(\frac{1}{2}Jzm_B +h))</math>''' |
Revision as of 12:20, 3 February 2009
I am looking at your page 6 of your lecture notes from here.
Looking at the Ising Model:
Then going to the formula for . Does the subscript i have anything to do with the index of summation i or does it stand for internal?
Vlad: it is the index of the considered site i. It feels an internal field from all the z sites connected to site i.
Also, why is the third formula:
I thought it would be:
since the external field is being subtracted in the initial equation above.
Vlad: there actually is a typo in these old notes. The correct expression should be:
since in the first expression , and the sum over the neighbors of the site just produce a factor .
Also on the homework, I am not sure where the and come into play. Do we just use them for the self consistent equations like we did in class:
or are we supposed to substitute one of them into the initial equation of the Ising Model?
Vlad: you see, here the same IDEA applies. However, the magnetization on sublattice A is expressed in terms of the magnetization on sublattice B. Thus we get a similar self-consistency conditions:
and
, etc.