Question: Difference between revisions

From PhyWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 33: Line 33:
or are we supposed to substitute one of them into the initial equation of the Ising Model?
or are we supposed to substitute one of them into the initial equation of the Ising Model?


'''Vlad: you see, here the same IDEA applies. However, the magnetization on sublattice A is expressed in therms of the magnetization on sublattice B. Thus we get a similar self-consistency conditions:'''
'''Vlad: you see, here the same IDEA applies. However, the magnetization on sublattice A is expressed in terms of the magnetization on sublattice B. Thus we get a similar self-consistency conditions:'''


'''<math>m_A = tanh(\beta(\frac{1}{2}Jzm_B +h))</math>'''
'''<math>m_A = tanh(\beta(\frac{1}{2}Jzm_B +h))</math>'''

Revision as of 12:20, 3 February 2009

I am looking at your page 6 of your lecture notes from here.

Looking at the Ising Model:

Then going to the formula for . Does the subscript i have anything to do with the index of summation i or does it stand for internal?

Vlad: it is the index of the considered site i. It feels an internal field from all the z sites connected to site i.

Also, why is the third formula:

I thought it would be:

since the external field is being subtracted in the initial equation above.


Vlad: there actually is a typo in these old notes. The correct expression should be:

since in the first expression , and the sum over the neighbors of the site just produce a factor .


Also on the homework, I am not sure where the and come into play. Do we just use them for the self consistent equations like we did in class:

or are we supposed to substitute one of them into the initial equation of the Ising Model?

Vlad: you see, here the same IDEA applies. However, the magnetization on sublattice A is expressed in terms of the magnetization on sublattice B. Thus we get a similar self-consistency conditions:

and

, etc.