Question: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
Then substituting this into the previous equations I get: | Then substituting this into the previous equations I get: | ||
<math>m_A = tanh( | <math>m_A = tanh(+\beta(h - \frac{1}{2}Jz(m - m^\dagger))</math> | ||
<math>m_B = tanh( | <math>m_B = tanh(+\beta(h - \frac{1}{2}Jz(m + m^\dagger))</math> |
Latest revision as of 15:04, 5 February 2009
Can you tell me if this is right? Ive spent some time now working on parts 2,3, and 4 and I am worried that I made an error in part 1 that is propagating to the later parts.
Vlad: I think you have some sign errors I corrected below. Note that in the case of antiferromagnetism, the interaction J has the opposite sign.
I found the two self-consistent equations for and to be:
Then I solved the relations for and and found that:
Then substituting this into the previous equations I get: