The Free-Particle Propagator

From PhyWiki
Revision as of 13:14, 19 June 2011 by StephanieReynolds (talk | contribs) (New page: Although our heuristic analysis yielded an exact free-particle propagator, we will now repeat the calculation without any approximation to illustrate the partial integration. Consider <mat...)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Although our heuristic analysis yielded an exact free-particle propagator, we will now repeat the calculation without any approximation to illustrate the partial integration. Consider . The peculiar labeling of the end points will be justified later. Our problem is to perform the path integral


Where

is a symbolic way of saying "integrate over all paths connecting and (in the interval and ).

." Now, a path is fully specified by an infinity of numbers ,..., , ...,, namely, the values of the function at every point is the interval to .To sum over all paths, we must integrate over all possible values of these infinite variables, except of course and , which will be kept fixed at and , respectively. To tackle this problem,we trade the function for a discrete approximation which agrees with at the points.agrees with x{t) at the N + 1 points , n = 0,.. . , N, where . In this approximation each path is specified by N+ 1 numbers . The gaps in the discrete function are interpolated by straight lines. We hope that if we take the limit at the end we will get a result that is insensitive to these approximations.t Now that the paths have been discretized, we must also do the same approximations.paths discretized, we must also do the same to the action integral. We replace the continuous path definition

where . We wish to calculate

It is implicit in the above that and have the values we have chosen at the outset. The factor A in the front is to be chosen at the end such that we get the correct scale for U when the limit is taken. Let us first switch to the variables

We then want

where

Although the multiple integral looks formidable, it is not. Let us begin by doing the integration. Considering just the part of the integrand that involves , we get


Consider next the integration over yr. Bringing in the part of the integrand involving and combining it with the result above we compute next