Problem Set 3: Difference between revisions

From PhyWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New page: Problem Set 3: Ising antiferromagnet on a ”bipartite” lattice, is defined by the Hamiltonian H = J 2 X<ij> SiSj − hXi Si. Note that now the interaction between spins minimizes the ...)
 
m (beta)
 
(17 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Problem Set 3: Ising antiferromagnet on a ”bipartite” lattice,
'''Ising antiferromagnet on a ”bipartite” lattice'''


is defined by the Hamiltonian
Hamiltonian:
H =
J
2 X<ij>
SiSj − hXi
Si.
Note that now the interaction between spins minimizes the energy when the
spins anti-allign, i.e. for Si = −Sj . A bipartite lattice is one that has two sublattices,
so that each spin on sublattice A interacts only with some spin on the
other sublattice B. In this case, in an antiferromagnetic state, each sublattice
assumes a uniform magnetization. We can introduce the magnetization for each
sublattice
mA = DS(A)
i E; mB = DS(B)
i E.


The average magnetization then can be written as
<math> H = \frac{J}{2} \sum_{<ij>} S_i S_j  -− h\sum_i S_i </math>,
m =
 
1
with the sum is over all nearest neighbor sites i and j. Note that now the interaction between spins minimizes the energy when the spins anti-allign, i.e. for <math>S_i = −- S_j\;</math> . A bipartite lattice is one that has two sublattices, so that each spin on sublattice A interacts only with some spin on the other sublattice B. In this case, in an antiferromagnetic state, each sublattice assumes a uniform magnetization. We can introduce the magnetization for each sublattice
2
 
(mA + mB) ,
<math>m_A = < S^{(A)} >; \; \; m_B = < S^{(B)} >.</math>
and the so-called ”staggered” magnetization is defined by the difference between
 
the two sublattices
 
m† =
The average magnetization then can be written as  
1
 
2
<math>m = \frac{1}{2} (m_A + m_B ),</math>
(mA − mB) .
 
For perfect ferromagnetic order m = 1, while for perfect antiferromagnetic order
and the so-called ”staggered” magnetization is defined by the difference between the two sublattices
m† = 1.
 
(a) Use Weiss mean-field decoupling to replace one of the spins in the Hamiltonian
<math>m^{\dagger} = \frac{1}{2} (m_A - m_B ),</math>
by its thermal average. The Weiss field experienced by a given spin is
 
then proportional to the sublattice magnetization on the other sublattice. Write
For perfect ferromagnetic order <math>m = 1\;</math>, while for perfect antiferromagnetic order
down self-consistent equations for mA and mB, and express them through the
<math>m^{\dagger} = 1</math>.
order parameters m and m†.
 
(b) Assume that h = 0, so that m = 0, and solve the mean-field equations
 
by expanding in m†. Determine the Neel (ordering) temperature, and calculate
(1) Use Weiss mean-field decoupling to replace one of the spins in the Hamiltonian by its thermal average. The Weiss field experienced by a given spin is then proportional to the sublattice magnetization on the other sublattice. Write down self-consistent equations for <math>m_A\;</math> and <math>m_B\;</math>, and express them through the
the order-parameter exponent .
order parameters <math>m\;</math> and <math>m^{\dagger}</math>.
(c*) Now consider a small external field h > 0, so that both order parameters
 
can assume a nonzero value (Note: m will be small). By keeping only the leading
 
terms in h and m, calculate the uniform spin susceptibility = @m/@h, as a
(2) Assume that <math>h = 0\;</math>, so that <math>m = 0\;</math>, and solve the mean-field equations by expanding in <math>m^{\dagger}</math>. Determine the Neel (ordering) temperature, and calculate the order-parameter exponent <math>\beta</math> .
function of temperature. Show that has a cusp around TN.
 
(d*) Imagine adding a ”staggered” external field h†, which would be positive
 
on sublattice A, but would be negative on sublattice B. Concentrate on the system
(3) Now consider a small external field <math>h > 0\;</math>, so that both order parameters can assume a nonzero value (Note: <math>m\;</math> will be small). By keeping only the leading terms in <math>h\;</math> and <math>m\;</math>, calculate the uniform spin susceptibility <math>\chi = \partial m/ \partial h</math>, as a function of temperature. Plot <math>\chi\;</math> as a function of temperature, and show that it has a cusp around <math>T_N\;</math>.
with no uniform field (h = 0), and determine the behavior of the staggered
 
susceptibility
 
�† =
(4) Imagine adding a ”staggered” external field <math>h^{\dagger}</math>, which would be positive on sublattice A, but would be negative on sublattice B. Concentrate on the system with no uniform field <math>(h = 0)\;</math>, and determine the behavior of the staggered susceptibility <math>\chi^{\dagger}= \partial m^{\dagger} / \partial h^{\dagger} </math>
@m†
. Show that <math>\chi^{\dagger}</math> blows up at the Neel temperature.
@h†
.
Show that �† blows up at the Neel temperature.

Latest revision as of 20:40, 3 February 2009

Ising antiferromagnet on a ”bipartite” lattice

Hamiltonian:

Failed to parse (syntax error): {\displaystyle H = \frac{J}{2} \sum_{<ij>} S_i S_j -− h\sum_i S_i } ,

with the sum is over all nearest neighbor sites i and j. Note that now the interaction between spins minimizes the energy when the spins anti-allign, i.e. for Failed to parse (syntax error): {\displaystyle S_i = −- S_j\;} . A bipartite lattice is one that has two sublattices, so that each spin on sublattice A interacts only with some spin on the other sublattice B. In this case, in an antiferromagnetic state, each sublattice assumes a uniform magnetization. We can introduce the magnetization for each sublattice


The average magnetization then can be written as

and the so-called ”staggered” magnetization is defined by the difference between the two sublattices

For perfect ferromagnetic order , while for perfect antiferromagnetic order .


(1) Use Weiss mean-field decoupling to replace one of the spins in the Hamiltonian by its thermal average. The Weiss field experienced by a given spin is then proportional to the sublattice magnetization on the other sublattice. Write down self-consistent equations for and , and express them through the order parameters and .


(2) Assume that , so that , and solve the mean-field equations by expanding in . Determine the Neel (ordering) temperature, and calculate the order-parameter exponent .


(3) Now consider a small external field , so that both order parameters can assume a nonzero value (Note: will be small). By keeping only the leading terms in and , calculate the uniform spin susceptibility , as a function of temperature. Plot as a function of temperature, and show that it has a cusp around .


(4) Imagine adding a ”staggered” external field , which would be positive on sublattice A, but would be negative on sublattice B. Concentrate on the system with no uniform field , and determine the behavior of the staggered susceptibility . Show that blows up at the Neel temperature.