Problem Set 3: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Hamiltonian: | Hamiltonian: | ||
<math> H = \frac{J}{2} \sum_{<ij>} S_i S_j − h\sum_i S_i </math> | <math> H = \frac{J}{2} \sum_{<ij>} S_i S_j -− h\sum_i S_i </math> | ||
Note that now the interaction between spins minimizes the energy when the spins anti-allign, i.e. for <math>S_i = −S_j</math> . A bipartite lattice is one that has two sublattices, so that each spin on sublattice A interacts only with some spin on the other sublattice B. In this case, in an antiferromagnetic state, each sublattice assumes a uniform magnetization. We can introduce the magnetization for each sublattice | Note that now the interaction between spins minimizes the energy when the spins anti-allign, i.e. for <math>S_i = −S_j</math> . A bipartite lattice is one that has two sublattices, so that each spin on sublattice A interacts only with some spin on the other sublattice B. In this case, in an antiferromagnetic state, each sublattice assumes a uniform magnetization. We can introduce the magnetization for each sublattice | ||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
<math>m^{\dagger} = 1</math>. | <math>m^{\dagger} = 1</math>. | ||
( | |||
by its thermal average. The Weiss field experienced by a given spin is | (1) Use Weiss mean-field decoupling to replace one of the spins in the Hamiltonian by its thermal average. The Weiss field experienced by a given spin is then proportional to the sublattice magnetization on the other sublattice. Write down self-consistent equations for <math>m_A</math> and <math>m_B</math>, and express them through the | ||
then proportional to the sublattice magnetization on the other sublattice. Write | order parameters <math>m</math> and <math>m^{\dagger}</math>. | ||
down self-consistent equations for | |||
order parameters m and | |||
( | (2) Assume that <math>h = 0</math>, so that <math>m = 0</math>, and solve the mean-field equations by expanding in <math>m^{\dagger}</math>. Determine the Neel (ordering) temperature, and calculate the order-parameter exponent. | ||
by expanding in | |||
the order-parameter exponent | |||
( | (3) Now consider a small external field <math>h > 0</math>, so that both order parameters can assume a nonzero value (Note: <math>m</math> will be small). By keeping only the leading terms in <math>h</math> and <math>m</math>, calculate the uniform spin susceptibility <math>\chi = \partial m/ \partial h</math>, as a function of temperature. Show that <math>\chi</math> has a cusp around <math>T_N</math>. | ||
can assume a nonzero value (Note: m will be small). By keeping only the leading | |||
terms in h and m, calculate the uniform spin susceptibility | |||
function of temperature. Show that | (4) Imagine adding a ”staggered” external field <math>h^{\dagger}</math>, which would be positive on sublattice A, but would be negative on sublattice B. Concentrate on the system with no uniform field <math>(h = 0)</math>, and determine the behavior of the staggered susceptibility | ||
( | |||
on sublattice A, but would be negative on sublattice B. Concentrate on the system | <math>\chi^{\dagger}= \partial m^{\dagger} / \partial h^{\dagger} </math> | ||
with no uniform field (h = 0), and determine the behavior of the staggered | |||
. | . | ||
Show that | Show that <math>\chi^{\dagger}</math> blows up at the Neel temperature. |
Revision as of 15:49, 27 January 2009
Ising antiferromagnet on a ”bipartite” lattice
Hamiltonian:
Failed to parse (syntax error): {\displaystyle H = \frac{J}{2} \sum_{<ij>} S_i S_j -− h\sum_i S_i }
Note that now the interaction between spins minimizes the energy when the spins anti-allign, i.e. for Failed to parse (syntax error): {\displaystyle S_i = −S_j} . A bipartite lattice is one that has two sublattices, so that each spin on sublattice A interacts only with some spin on the other sublattice B. In this case, in an antiferromagnetic state, each sublattice assumes a uniform magnetization. We can introduce the magnetization for each sublattice
The average magnetization then can be written as
and the so-called ”staggered” magnetization is defined by the difference between the two sublattices
For perfect ferromagnetic order , while for perfect antiferromagnetic order .
(1) Use Weiss mean-field decoupling to replace one of the spins in the Hamiltonian by its thermal average. The Weiss field experienced by a given spin is then proportional to the sublattice magnetization on the other sublattice. Write down self-consistent equations for and , and express them through the
order parameters and .
(2) Assume that , so that , and solve the mean-field equations by expanding in . Determine the Neel (ordering) temperature, and calculate the order-parameter exponent.
(3) Now consider a small external field , so that both order parameters can assume a nonzero value (Note: will be small). By keeping only the leading terms in and , calculate the uniform spin susceptibility , as a function of temperature. Show that has a cusp around .
(4) Imagine adding a ”staggered” external field , which would be positive on sublattice A, but would be negative on sublattice B. Concentrate on the system with no uniform field , and determine the behavior of the staggered susceptibility
. Show that blows up at the Neel temperature.