Phy5645/HO Virial Theorem: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
We can now write the average potential for the <math>n^{\text{th}}</math> state of the harmonic oscillator as | We can now write the average potential for the <math>n^{\text{th}}</math> state of the harmonic oscillator as | ||
<math> \langle V \rangle = \frac{k}{ | <math> \langle V \rangle = \frac{\hbar k}{4m\omega}\langle n|(\hat{a} + \hat{a}^\dagger)^2|n \rangle </math> | ||
<math> = \frac{k}{ | <math> = \frac{\hbar k}{4m\omega}\langle n|(\hat{a}^2 + \hat{a}^{\dagger 2} + \hat{a}\hat{a}^\dagger + \hat{a}^\dagger\hat{a})|n \rangle </math> | ||
<math> = \frac{k}{ | <math> = \frac{\hbar k}{4m\omega}[\langle n|\hat{a}^2|n \rangle + \langle n|\hat{a}^\dagger|n \rangle + \langle n|(\hat{a}\hat{a}^\dagger + \hat{a}^\dagger\hat{a})|n \rangle] </math> | ||
The first two terms are zero because | |||
<math> \langle n|n-2 \rangle = \langle n|n+2 \rangle = 0 </math> | <math> \langle n|n-2 \rangle = \langle n|n+2 \rangle = 0 </math> |
Revision as of 16:56, 8 August 2013
The average potential energy is given by
Recall from a previous problem that
or
We can now write the average potential for the state of the harmonic oscillator as
The first two terms are zero because
and the operator in the third term can be written like:
since
and
So, now we have that:
And, replacing , we find that
And can check that
Which shows rather nicely that the Virial Theorem holds for the Quantum Harmonic Oscillator.
(See Liboff, Richard Introductory Quantum Mechanics, 4th Edition, Problem 7.10 for reference.)