Solution to Set 3: Difference between revisions

From PhyWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Linking)
Line 43: Line 43:
'''Use [[PHZ3400 Symmetry Breaking#Ferromagnet and Curie-Weiss Theory|Weiss mean-field decoupling]] to replace one of the spins in the Hamiltonian by its thermal average. The Weiss field experienced by a given spin is then proportional to the sublattice magnetization on the other sublattice. Write down self-consistent equations for <math>m_A\;</math> and <math>m_B\;</math>, and express them through the order parameters <math>m\;</math> and <math>m^{\dagger}</math>.'''
'''Use [[PHZ3400 Symmetry Breaking#Ferromagnet and Curie-Weiss Theory|Weiss mean-field decoupling]] to replace one of the spins in the Hamiltonian by its thermal average. The Weiss field experienced by a given spin is then proportional to the sublattice magnetization on the other sublattice. Write down self-consistent equations for <math>m_A\;</math> and <math>m_B\;</math>, and express them through the order parameters <math>m\;</math> and <math>m^{\dagger}</math>.'''


===The Weiss Molecular Field===
Given the Hamiltonian for a classical [[Ising model|Ising antiferromagnet]] on a [[Bipartite lattice|”bipartite” lattice]]:


'''Chapter 8.3.1 of Solid State Physics'''
The systematic way of replacing the spin operator in the Heisenberg Hamiltonian by their average values in order to obtain the Weiss molecular field approximation is to insert
<math> S_i = < S > + (S_i - < S >) </math> and <math> S_j = < S > + (S_j - < S >) </math> into
<math> H = \frac{J}{2} \sum_{<ij>} S_i S_j  -− h\sum_i S_i </math>
<math> H = \frac{J}{2} \sum_{<ij>} S_i S_j  -− h\sum_i S_i </math>


<!-- EVERYTHING BELOW IS COMMENTED OUT
where
* <math>H</math> = Hamiltonian, the total energy of the system
* <math>J</math> = Interaction Energy where J < 0  because it’s anti-ferromagnetic
* <math>S</math> = Spin with value of 1 or -1
* <math>h</math> = Magnetic field energy from external sources that breaks the symmetry


The answer becomes
The magnetization on each sublattice
<math> H \approx \frac{1}{2} \lambda \mu_0 \textbf{M}^{2} - \sum_{i}\lambda \mu_0 \mu_i \textbf{M} </math>
 
where
* <math>\lambda = \frac{2 \sum_{j \neq i} \jmath_{i j}} {N \mu_0 g^2 \mu_b^2}</math>
* <math>\mu_i = -g \mu_b \textbf{S}_i</math>
 
<font color=red>'''I do not like what you have done here. You are copying from some source, rather then solving the problem I have assigned, following the approach described in lectures. This needs to be redone.''' </font>
 
    EVERYTHING ABOVE IS COMMENTED OUT -->


==Part 2==
==Part 2==

Revision as of 01:59, 2 March 2009

Ferromagnetism

Group 3 is the best
Ferromagnetism
Ferromagnetic ordering of microscopic magnets (the magnetic moments of individual particles)
Books
Topics Magnetic Order
Ferromagnetism
Weiss field
Solid State Physics Section 8.3
Section 8.4
Soft Condensed Matter Section 3.2

Given Information

  • Magnetization for Lattice A:
  • Magnetization for Lattice B:
  • Average magnetization:
  • "Staggered” magnetization:

(Note: It's the difference between the two sublattices)

  • for perfect ferromagnetic order
  • for perfect antiferromagnetic order

Part 1

Use Weiss mean-field decoupling to replace one of the spins in the Hamiltonian by its thermal average. The Weiss field experienced by a given spin is then proportional to the sublattice magnetization on the other sublattice. Write down self-consistent equations for and , and express them through the order parameters and .

Given the Hamiltonian for a classical Ising antiferromagnet on a ”bipartite” lattice:

Failed to parse (syntax error): {\displaystyle H = \frac{J}{2} \sum_{<ij>} S_i S_j -− h\sum_i S_i }

where

  • = Hamiltonian, the total energy of the system
  • = Interaction Energy where J < 0 because it’s anti-ferromagnetic
  • = Spin with value of 1 or -1
  • = Magnetic field energy from external sources that breaks the symmetry

The magnetization on each sublattice

Part 2

Assume that , so that , and solve the mean-field equations by expanding in . Determine the Neel (ordering) temperature, and calculate the order-parameter exponent.

The Néel Temperature

Chapter 8.4 of Solid State Physics

where

  • is Néel Temperature, the onset temperature for antiferromagnetism
  • is Curie constant

Part 3

Now consider a small external field , so that both order parameters can assume a nonzero value (Note: will be small). By keeping only the leading terms in and , calculate the uniform spin susceptibility , as a function of temperature. Plot as a function of temperature, and show that it has a cusp around .

Xtgraph.jpg

Part 4

Imagine adding a ”staggered” external field , which would be positive on sublattice A, but would be negative on sublattice B. Concentrate on the system with no uniform field , and determine the behavior of the staggered susceptibility . Show that blows up at the Neel temperature.