User:DimitriosLazarou: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Feynman diagrams''' | '''Feynman diagrams''' | ||
Complete calculations of Green's functions is a rather formidable task. Even the basic imaginary time evolution operator itself is an infinite series to all orders in the interaction <math>V(&tau)</math>. One can simply get lost in the dozens of integrals; his physical intuition also doesn't get things any better. Feynman diagrams are both an exact mathematical representation of perturbation theory in infinite order and a powerful pictorial method showing in a unique way the physical content of a given expression. | Complete calculations of Green's functions is a rather formidable task. Even the basic imaginary time evolution operator itself is an infinite series to all orders in the interaction <math>V(τ)</math>. One can simply get lost in the dozens of integrals; his physical intuition also doesn't get things any better. Feynman diagrams are both an exact mathematical representation of perturbation theory in infinite order and a powerful pictorial method showing in a unique way the physical content of a given expression. | ||
Revision as of 17:41, 5 December 2011
Feynman diagrams
Complete calculations of Green's functions is a rather formidable task. Even the basic imaginary time evolution operator itself is an infinite series to all orders in the interaction Failed to parse (syntax error): {\displaystyle V(τ)} . One can simply get lost in the dozens of integrals; his physical intuition also doesn't get things any better. Feynman diagrams are both an exact mathematical representation of perturbation theory in infinite order and a powerful pictorial method showing in a unique way the physical content of a given expression.