Phy5670/RPA: Difference between revisions

From PhyWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 67: Line 67:


====Random Phase Approximation====
====Random Phase Approximation====
First, let us consider the non-interacting limit of the polarization propagator, which can be obtained from Eq. (3) by replacing <math> H </math> by the non-interacting Hamiltonian <math> H_{o} </math> and replacing <math> |\psi_{o}^{N} \rangle </math> by the non-interacting ground state <math> |\phi_{o}^{N} \rangle </math>,
<math> </math>


====RPA in Finite Systems and the Schematic Model====
====RPA in Finite Systems and the Schematic Model====

Revision as of 17:24, 4 December 2010

Polarization Propagator

To study excited states in meny-fermion systems, the limit of the two-particle (tp) propagator is used

(Eq. 1)

where "ph" means "particle-hole pairs". Substituting the explicit form of the Heisenberg operators and inserting a complete set of N-particle state one has

(Eq. 2)

where the definition of the time-ordering operator in terms of step functions is used also. The so-called polarization propagator is defined by Eq. (2) which includes the excited states only:

(Eq. 3)

By employing the integral formulation of the step function, that is,

one can transform the polarization propagator, Eq. (3), into its Lehmann representation as following: (Let us calculate the first term in Eq. (3) first and let .)

Similarly, the second term in Eq. (3) cab be Fourier transformed into this form:

Hence we obtain the polarization propagator in Lehmann representation

(Eq. 4)

The polarization propagator incorporates the energy of excited states of N-particle system in its denominator, whereas its numerator contains the transition amplitudes connecting the ground state with those excited states.

Random Phase Approximation

First, let us consider the non-interacting limit of the polarization propagator, which can be obtained from Eq. (3) by replacing by the non-interacting Hamiltonian and replacing by the non-interacting ground state ,

RPA in Finite Systems and the Schematic Model