Relation Between the Wave Function and Probability Density: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
(12 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
We will now show that the solution to the [[Schrödinger equation]] conserves probability, i.e. the probability to find the particle somewhere in the space does not change with time. To see that it does, consider | We will now show that the solution to the [[Schrödinger equation]] conserves probability, i.e. the probability to find the particle somewhere in the space does not change with time. To see that it does, consider | ||
<math>i\hbar\frac{\partial}{\partial t}\Psi(\textbf{r},t)=\left[-\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\nabla^2+V(\textbf{r})\right]\Psi(\textbf{r},t)</math> | |||
Now multiply both sides by the complex conjugate of <math>\psi(\textbf{r},t) \!</math> | Now multiply both sides by the complex conjugate of <math>\psi(\textbf{r},t):\!</math> | ||
<math>i\hbar\Psi^{\ast}(\textbf{r},t)\frac{\partial}{\partial t}\Psi(\textbf{r},t)=\Psi^{\ast}(\textbf{r},t)\left[-\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\nabla^2+V(\textbf{r})\right]\Psi(\textbf{r},t)</math> | |||
:<math>\frac{\partial}{\partial t} \left( \Psi^{\ast}(\textbf{r},t)\Psi(\textbf{r},t)\right) + \frac{\hbar}{2im} \nabla \cdot \left[\Psi^{\ast}(\textbf{r},t)\nabla \Psi(\textbf{r},t)-(\nabla\Psi^{\ast}(\textbf{r},t)) \Psi(\textbf{r},t)\right]=0</math> | Now, take the complex conjugate of this entire expression: | ||
<math>-i\hbar\Psi(\textbf{r},t)\frac{\partial}{\partial t}\Psi^{\ast}(\textbf{r},t)=\Psi(\textbf{r},t)\left[-\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\nabla^2+V(\textbf{r})\right]\Psi^{\ast}(\textbf{r},t)</math> | |||
Taking the difference of the above equations, we finally find | |||
<math>\frac{\partial}{\partial t} \left( \Psi^{\ast}(\textbf{r},t)\Psi(\textbf{r},t)\right) + \frac{\hbar}{2im} \nabla \cdot \left[\Psi^{\ast}(\textbf{r},t)\nabla \Psi(\textbf{r},t)-(\nabla\Psi^{\ast}(\textbf{r},t)) \Psi(\textbf{r},t)\right]=0</math> | |||
Note that this is in the form of a continuity equation, | |||
<math>\frac{\partial}{\partial t} \rho(\textbf{r},t) + \nabla \cdot \textbf{j}(\textbf{r},t)=0,</math> | |||
where | where | ||
<math>\rho(\textbf{r},t)=\Psi^{\ast}(\textbf{r},t)\Psi(\textbf{r},t)\!</math> | |||
is the probability density, and | is the probability density, and | ||
Line 50: | Line 52: | ||
Once we know that the densities and currents constructed from the solution of the Schrödinger equation satisfy the continuity equation, it is easy to show that the probability is conserved. | Once we know that the densities and currents constructed from the solution of the Schrödinger equation satisfy the continuity equation, it is easy to show that the probability is conserved. | ||
To see that | To see this, note that | ||
:<math>\frac{d}{dt}\int d^3\textbf{r} |\Psi(\textbf{r},t)|^2=-\int d^3\textbf{r}(\nabla\cdot \textbf{j})=-\oint d\textbf{A} \cdot \textbf{j} =0.</math> | |||
Here, we used the fact that the wave function is assumed to vanish outside of the boundary, and thus the current vanishes as well. Therefore, we see that the normalization of the wave function does not change over time, so that we only need to normalize it at one instant in time, as asserted earlier. | |||
==Problems== | |||
'''(1)''' Consider a particle moving in a potential field <math>V(\textbf{r}).</math> | |||
'''(a)''' Prove that the average energy is <math>\langle E\rangle=\int W\,d^3\textbf{r}=\int\left (\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\nabla\Psi^{\ast}\cdot\nabla\Psi+\Psi^{\ast}V\Psi\right )\,d^3\textbf{r},</math> where <math>W</math> is energy density. | |||
'''(b)''' Prove the energy conservation equation, <math>\frac{\partial W}{\partial t}+\nabla \cdot \textbf{S}=0,</math> where <math>\textbf{S}=-\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\left (\frac{\partial\Psi^{\ast}}{\partial t}\nabla\Psi + \frac{\partial\Psi}{\partial t}\nabla\Psi^{\ast}\right )</math> is the energy flux density. | |||
[[Phy5645/Energy_conservation|Solution]] | |||
'''(2)''' Assume that the Hamiltonian for a system of <math>N</math> particles is <math>\hat{H}=-\sum_{i=1}^{N}\frac{\hbar}{2m}\nabla_{i}^{2}+\sum_{i=1}^{N}\rho_{ij}(|\textbf{r}_{i}-\textbf{r}_{j}|)</math>, and <math>\Psi(\textbf{r}_{1},\textbf{r}_{2},\ldots,\textbf{r}_{N};t)</math> is the wave fuction. Defining | |||
<math>\rho(\textbf{r},t)=\sum\rho_{i}(\textbf{r},t),</math> | |||
<math>\textbf{j}(\textbf{r},t)=\sum\textbf{j}_{i}(\textbf{r},t),</math> | |||
<math>\rho_{1}(\textbf{r}_{1},t)=\int\cdots\int d^{3}\textbf{r}_{2}\,d^{3}\textbf{r}_{3}\,\cdots\,d^{3}\textbf{r}_{N}\,\Psi^{\star}\Psi,</math> | |||
<math>\textbf{j}_{1}(\textbf{r}_{1},t)=-\frac{i\hbar}{2m}\int\cdots\int d^{3}\textbf{r}_{2}\,d^{3}\textbf{r}_{3}\,\cdots\,d^{3}\textbf{r}_{N}\,(\Psi^{\star}\nabla_{1}\Psi-\Psi\nabla_{1}\Psi^{\star}),</math> | |||
and similarly for the other <math>\rho_i</math> and <math>\textbf{j}_i</math>, prove the following relation: | |||
<math>\frac{\partial\rho}{\partial t}+\nabla\cdot\textbf{j}=0</math> | |||
[[Phy5645/schrodingerequationhomework2|Solution]] |
Latest revision as of 13:37, 8 August 2013
The quantity can be interpreted as probability density. In order for us to do so, two conditions must be met. First, the probability amplitude must be positive semi-definite (equal to or greater than zero). This condition is trivial because is always a non-negative function. Second, the probability density, integrated over all space, must be equal to one:
We will show that, if this relation is satisfied for a specific time, then it is satisfied for all times shortly.
Because of the fact that we may interpret as a probability density, we may calculate expectation values of observables, such as position and momentum, in terms of it. In general, the expectation value of an observable is given by
In particular, the expectation value of a position coordinate is
and that for a component of momentum is
Conservation of Probability
We will now show that the solution to the Schrödinger equation conserves probability, i.e. the probability to find the particle somewhere in the space does not change with time. To see that it does, consider
Now multiply both sides by the complex conjugate of
Now, take the complex conjugate of this entire expression:
Taking the difference of the above equations, we finally find
Note that this is in the form of a continuity equation,
where
is the probability density, and
is the probability current.
Once we know that the densities and currents constructed from the solution of the Schrödinger equation satisfy the continuity equation, it is easy to show that the probability is conserved.
To see this, note that
Here, we used the fact that the wave function is assumed to vanish outside of the boundary, and thus the current vanishes as well. Therefore, we see that the normalization of the wave function does not change over time, so that we only need to normalize it at one instant in time, as asserted earlier.
Problems
(1) Consider a particle moving in a potential field
(a) Prove that the average energy is where is energy density.
(b) Prove the energy conservation equation, where is the energy flux density.
(2) Assume that the Hamiltonian for a system of particles is , and is the wave fuction. Defining
and similarly for the other and , prove the following relation: