Isotropic Harmonic Oscillator: Difference between revisions

From PhyWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
We now solve the isotropic harmonic oscillator using the formalism that we have just developed.  While it is possible to solve it in Cartesian coordinates, we gain additional insight by solving it in spherical coordinates, and it is easier to determine the degeneracy of each energy level.
We now solve the isotropic harmonic oscillator using the formalism that we have just developed.  While it is possible to solve it in Cartesian coordinates, we gain additional insight by solving it in spherical coordinates, and it is easier to determine the degeneracy of each energy level.


The radial part of the [[Schrödinger Equation|Schrödinger equation]] for a particle of mass <math>M\!</math> in an isotropic [[Harmonic oscillator spectrum and eigenstates|harmonic oscillator]] potential <math>V(r)=\frac{1}{2}M\omega^{2}r^2</math> is given by:
The radial part of the [[Schrödinger Equation|Schrödinger equation]] for a particle of mass <math>M\!</math> in an isotropic [[Harmonic Oscillator Spectrum and Eigenstates|harmonic oscillator]] potential <math>V(r)=\frac{1}{2}M\omega^{2}r^2</math> is given by:


:<math>-\frac{\hbar^2}{2M}\frac{\partial^2u_{nl}(r)}{\partial r^2}+\left(\frac{\hbar^2}{2M}\frac{l(l+1)}{r^2} + \frac{1}{2}Mw^{2}r^2\right)u_{nl}(r)=Eu_{nl}(r)</math>
:<math>-\frac{\hbar^2}{2M}\frac{d^2u_{nl}}{dr^2}+\left(\frac{\hbar^2}{2M}\frac{l(l+1)}{r^2} + \frac{1}{2}M\omega^{2}r^2\right)u_{nl}=Eu_{nl}.</math>


We look at the solutions <math>u_{nl}\!</math> in the asymptotic limits of <math> r\!</math>.
Let us begin by looking at the solutions <math>u_{nl}\!</math> in the limits of small and large <math>r.\!</math>


As <math>r\rightarrow 0\!</math>, the equation reduces to
As <math>r\rightarrow 0\!</math>, the equation reduces to
:<math>-\frac{\hbar^2}{2M}\frac{\partial^2u_{l}(r)}{\partial r^2}+\frac{\hbar^2}{2M}\frac{l(l+1)}{r^2}u_{l}(r)=Eu_{l}(r)</math>
whose nondivergent solution is given by <math>u_l(r)\simeq r^{^{l+1}}</math>.


On the otherhand, as <math>  r\rightarrow \infty</math>, the equation becomes
<math>-\frac{\hbar^2}{2M}\frac{d^2u_{nl}}{dr^2}+\frac{\hbar^2}{2M}\frac{l(l+1)}{r^2}u_{nl}=Eu_{nl}.</math>
:<math>-\frac{\hbar^2}{2M}\frac{\partial^2u(r)}{\partial r^2}+\frac{1}{2}Mw^{2}r^2u(r)=Eu(r)</math>
whose solution is given by <math>u(r)\simeq e^-{\frac{Mwr^2}{2\hbar}}</math>.


Combining the asymptotic limit solutions we choose the general solution to the equation as
The only solution of this equation that does not diverge as <math>r\rightarrow 0</math> is <math>u_{nl}(r)\simeq r^{l+1}.</math>
:<math>u_l(r)=f_l(r)r^{l+1}e^-\frac{Mwr^2}{2\hbar}</math>


Substituting this expression into the original equation,
In the limit as <math>r\rightarrow \infty,</math> on the other hand, the equation becomes
:<math>\frac{\partial^2f_l(r) }{\partial r^2}+2\left(\frac{l+1}{r}-\frac{Mw}{\hbar}r\right)\frac{\partial f_l(r) }{\partial r}+\left[\frac{2ME}{\hbar^2}-(2l+3)\frac{Mw}{\hbar}\right]f_l(r) =0</math>
 
<math>-\frac{\hbar^2}{2M}\frac{d^2u_{nl}}{dr^2}+\frac{1}{2}M\omega^{2}r^2u_{nl}=Eu_{nl}</math>
 
whose solution is given by <math>u_{nl}(r)\simeq e^{-M\omega r^2/2\hbar}.</math>
 
We may now assume that the general solution to the equation is given by
 
<math>u_{nl}(r)=r^{l+1}e^{-M\omega r^2/2\hbar}f_{nl}(r).</math>
 
Substituting this expression into the original equation, we obtain
 
<math>\frac{\partial^2f_l(r) }{\partial r^2}+2\left(\frac{l+1}{r}-\frac{Mw}{\hbar}r\right)\frac{\partial f_l(r) }{\partial r}+\left[\frac{2ME}{\hbar^2}-(2l+3)\frac{Mw}{\hbar}\right]f_l(r) =0</math>


Now we try the power series solution  
Now we try the power series solution  

Revision as of 00:14, 1 September 2013

Quantum Mechanics A
SchrodEq.png
Schrödinger Equation
The most fundamental equation of quantum mechanics; given a Hamiltonian , it describes how a state evolves in time.
Basic Concepts and Theory of Motion
UV Catastrophe (Black-Body Radiation)
Photoelectric Effect
Stability of Matter
Double Slit Experiment
Stern-Gerlach Experiment
The Principle of Complementarity
The Correspondence Principle
The Philosophy of Quantum Theory
Brief Derivation of Schrödinger Equation
Relation Between the Wave Function and Probability Density
Stationary States
Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle
Some Consequences of the Uncertainty Principle
Linear Vector Spaces and Operators
Commutation Relations and Simultaneous Eigenvalues
The Schrödinger Equation in Dirac Notation
Transformations of Operators and Symmetry
Time Evolution of Expectation Values and Ehrenfest's Theorem
One-Dimensional Bound States
Oscillation Theorem
The Dirac Delta Function Potential
Scattering States, Transmission and Reflection
Motion in a Periodic Potential
Summary of One-Dimensional Systems
Harmonic Oscillator Spectrum and Eigenstates
Analytical Method for Solving the Simple Harmonic Oscillator
Coherent States
Charged Particles in an Electromagnetic Field
WKB Approximation
The Heisenberg Picture: Equations of Motion for Operators
The Interaction Picture
The Virial Theorem
Commutation Relations
Angular Momentum as a Generator of Rotations in 3D
Spherical Coordinates
Eigenvalue Quantization
Orbital Angular Momentum Eigenfunctions
General Formalism
Free Particle in Spherical Coordinates
Spherical Well
Isotropic Harmonic Oscillator
Hydrogen Atom
WKB in Spherical Coordinates
Feynman Path Integrals
The Free-Particle Propagator
Propagator for the Harmonic Oscillator
Differential Cross Section and the Green's Function Formulation of Scattering
Central Potential Scattering and Phase Shifts
Coulomb Potential Scattering

We now solve the isotropic harmonic oscillator using the formalism that we have just developed. While it is possible to solve it in Cartesian coordinates, we gain additional insight by solving it in spherical coordinates, and it is easier to determine the degeneracy of each energy level.

The radial part of the Schrödinger equation for a particle of mass in an isotropic harmonic oscillator potential is given by:

Let us begin by looking at the solutions in the limits of small and large

As , the equation reduces to

The only solution of this equation that does not diverge as is

In the limit as on the other hand, the equation becomes

whose solution is given by

We may now assume that the general solution to the equation is given by

Substituting this expression into the original equation, we obtain

Now we try the power series solution

Substituting this solution into the reduced form of the equation,

which reduces to the equation

For this equation to hold, the coefficients of each of the powers of r must vanish seperately.

So,when the coefficient of is zero, implying that need not be zero.

Equating the coefficient of to be zero, implying that must be zero.

Equating the coefficient of to be zero, we get the recursion relation which is:


The function contains only even powers in n and is given by:

Now as , diverges so that for finite solution, the series should stop after leading to the quantization condition:

As a result, the energy of the isotropic harmonic oscillator is given by:

with

The degeneracy corresponding to the nth level is:

The total wavefunction of the isotropic Harmonic Oscillator is given by: