|
|
Line 33: |
Line 33: |
| ==Contribution from Classical Path== | | ==Contribution from Classical Path== |
|
| |
|
| The classical action <math>S</math> can be evaluated as follows: | | We will begin by evaluating the "classical" contribution to the propagator. This is essentially just a problem of classical mechanics; we begin by solving for the classical motion of the particle. The equation of motion is, as stated earlier, |
|
| |
|
| <math>S=\int_{0}^{t}(KE-PE)dt </math> | | <math>\ddot{x}_c+\omega^2x_c=0.\!</math> |
|
| |
|
| Where <math>KE\!</math> is the kinetic engergy and <math>PE\!</math> is the potential energy.
| | We impose the boundary conditions, <math>x(t_i)=x_i\!</math> and <math>x(t_f)=x_f.\!</math> The solution of the equation of motion that satisfies these boundary conditions is |
|
| |
| Equation of motion for harmonic oscillator:
| |
| <math>x_{cl}(t')=A\cos(\omega t')+B\sin(\omega t')\!</math><br/>
| |
| <math>A\!</math> and <math>B\!</math> are constants.
| |
|
| |
| At <math>t'=0\!</math> (starting point),<math>x_{cl}(0)=x_0\rightarrow A=x_0</math>.
| |
|
| |
|
| At <math>t'=t\!</math> (final point), <math>x_{cl}(t)=x\rightarrow B=\frac{x-x_0\cos(\omega t)}{\sin(\omega t)}</math> . </math>
| | <math>x_c(t)=x_i\frac{\sin{\omega(t_f-t)}}{\sin{\omega(t_f-t_i)}}+x_f\frac{\sin{\omega(t-t_i)}}{\sin{\omega(t_f-t_i)}},</math> |
|
| |
|
| is a symbolic way of saying "integrate over all paths connecting <math>{x_{0}}</math> and <math>{x_{N}}</math> (in the interval <math>{t_{0}}</math> and <math>{t_{N}}</math>)." Now, a path <math>{x_{t}}</math> is fully specified by an infinity of numbers <math>{x(t_{0})}</math>,..., <math>{x(t)}</math>, ...,<math>{x(t_{N})}</math>, namely, the values of the function <math>{x(t)}</math> at every point <math>{t}</math> is the interval <math>{t_{0}}</math> to <math>{t_{N}}</math>. To sum over all paths, we must integrate over all possible values of these infinite variables, except of course <math>{x(t_{0})}</math> and <math>{x(t_{N})}</math>, which will be kept fixed at <math>{x_{0}}</math> and <math>{x_{N}}</math>, respectively. To tackle this problem, we follow this idea that was used in section 1.10: we trade the function <math>{x_{t}}</math> for a discrete approximation which agrees with <math>{x_{t}}</math> at the <math>{N+1}</math> points.
| | and the corresponding velocity is |
| Substitute:
| |
|
| |
|
| <math>x_{cl}(t')= x_0\cos(\omega t')+\frac{x-x_0\cos(\omega t)}{\sin(\omega t)}\sin(\omega t') | | <math>x_c(t)=-\omega x_i\frac{\cos{\omega(t_f-t)}}{\sin{\omega(t_f-t_i)}}+\omega x_f\frac{\cos{\omega(t-t_i)}}{\sin{\omega(t_f-t_i)}}.</math> |
| \Rightarrow \frac{dx_{cl}(t')}{dt'}= -\omega x_0\sin(\omega t')+\omega \frac{x-x_0\cos(\omega t)}{\sin(\omega t)}\cos(\omega t')</math> <br/>
| |
| <math>KE= \frac{1}{2}m\left(\frac{dx_{cl}}{dt}\right)^2=\frac{1}{2}m\left[-\omega x_0\sin(\omega t')+\omega \frac{x-x_0\cos(\omega t)}{\sin(\omega t)}\cos(\omega t')\right]^2</math><br/>
| |
| <math>PE= \frac{1}{2}k(x_{cl}(t'))^2=\frac{1}{2}k\left[x_0\cos(\omega t')+\frac{x-x_0\cos(\omega t)}{\sin(\omega t)}\sin(\omega t')\right]^2</math> <br/>
| |
| Substituting, integrating from time 0 to time <math> t \! </math> and simplifying, we get:
| |
|
| |
|
| <math>S=S(t,x,x_0)=\frac{m\omega}{2\sin(\omega t)}((x^2+x_0^2)\cos(\omega t)-2xx_0)</math><br/> | | If we now substitute these expressions into the Lagrangian and simplify, we obtain |
| | |
| | <math>L=\frac{m\omega^2}{2\sin^2{\omega(t_f-t_i)}}\{(x_i^2+x_f^2)\cos[2\omega(t-t_i)]-2x_ix_f\cos{\omega(t_i+t_f-2t)}\}.</math> |
| | |
| | If we now substitute this into the action, we finally obtain |
| | |
| | <math>S_c=\frac{m\omega}{2\sin{\omega(t_f-t_i)}}((x_i^2+x_f^2)\cos{\omega(t_f-t_i)}-2x_ix_f).</math> |
|
| |
|
| Explicit evaluation of the path integral for the harmonic oscillator can be found here [[Image:FeynmanHibbs_H_O_Amplitude.pdf]] | | Explicit evaluation of the path integral for the harmonic oscillator can be found here [[Image:FeynmanHibbs_H_O_Amplitude.pdf]] |
We will now evaluate the propagator for the harmonic oscillator. The Lagrangian for this system is
Before we begin, let us prove that the propagator will separate into two factors; one of these comes entirely from the classical motion of the system, and the other comes entirely from quantum fluctuations about said trajectory. To this end, let us write
where
is the classical trajectory and
is the fluctuation, which will be a new integration variable for the path integral. If we take
and
to be the initial and final times, respectively, then
Substituting this into the action, we get
We now expand out the squares, obtaining
If we integrate by parts in the third term, we get
We know, however, that the classical motion obeys the equation,
As a result, the third term is zero, and the action separates into two contributions, one coming entirely from the classical motion, and the other coming entirely from quantum fluctuations. Denoting these two contributions as
and
the propagator may now be written as
We will now evaluate each of these contributions.
Contribution from Classical Path
We will begin by evaluating the "classical" contribution to the propagator. This is essentially just a problem of classical mechanics; we begin by solving for the classical motion of the particle. The equation of motion is, as stated earlier,
We impose the boundary conditions,
and
The solution of the equation of motion that satisfies these boundary conditions is
and the corresponding velocity is
If we now substitute these expressions into the Lagrangian and simplify, we obtain
If we now substitute this into the action, we finally obtain
Explicit evaluation of the path integral for the harmonic oscillator can be found here File:FeynmanHibbs H O Amplitude.pdf
Contribution From Fluctuations
Now, let's evaluate the path integral:
Note that the integrand is taken over all possible trajectory starting at point
at time
,
ending at point
at time
.
Expanding this integral,
where
.
Expanding the path trajectory in Fourier series, we have
we may express
in the form
where C is a constant independent of the frequency which comes from the Jacobian of the transformation.
The important point is that it does not depend on the frequency
.
Thus, evaluating the integral of,
where C' is a constant directly related to C and still independent of the frequency of motion.
Since the first product series in this final expression is also independent of the frequency of motion,
we can absorb it into our constant C' to have a new constant, C. Simplifying further,
In the limit
, we already know that
Thus,
and
Reference
For a more detailed evaluation of this problem, please see Barone, F. A.; Boschi-Filho, H.; Farina, C. 2002. "Three methods for calculating the Feynman propagator". American Association of Physics Teachers, 2003. Am. J. Phys. 71 (5), May 2003. pp 483-491.